Anatomy of the ‘Sixth Sense’: How to Avoid Titanic-like Disaster
Back in the XX century, the researchers noticed a strange
pattern: the most frequently occurring disasters and accidents with the planes
and trains take place when they are filled with passengers half of their
capacity, while the safe trips are sent en route with at least 76% of the
passengers present.
This mysterious finding can be explained only by the existence
of intuition. Life expectancy and its quality directly
correlate with the “sixth” sense. But why isn’t this gift uniformly
distributed among people?
Intuition of destiny
Intuitive knowledge can actively influence a person’s life: on
many occasions, the intuition saved someone’s life (in fact,
there was someone who had not bookedtickets to the advertised as
“absolutely safe” “Titanic” vessel). There are many examples when intuition
helped people to get wealthier. An experienced entrepreneur sometimes will get
a gut feeling to discern a hidden catch in the behavior of potential partners.
This is nothing short of phenomenon called social
intuition. Social intuition tells young lady who is about to get
married about the most suitable candidate she will choose. There are a number
of professions in which social intuition plays a truly crucial role: judges
sometimes intuitively render their verdicts, estimating at a
subconscious level “untrustworthy” elements of society; medical specialists
intuitively diagnose complex health problems.
The scope and extent for self-realization of social intuition
for representatives of HR-department can also be overwhelming! After all, with
well-developed social instincts they can “see” right through potential jobseekers:
catch on embellishments and to predict theiraccomplishments and potential
relationships with other employees within the company.
Practical experience is the basis for
intuitive knowledge. Over time, we
create somecommon stereotypes: good – evil, superficial -wise, and
so on. Remarkably, we can discern another person’s qualities instantly, and it
does not even need to involve an exchange of words!
The status and personal character of another individual are
collected only by peripheral layers of consciousness: the gestures
and facial expressions will be directly transformed into accumulated intuitive
profile, which then prompts us to form an opinion about these people. Later,
this opinion toward another person may change when the conscious analysis comes
to play, but not during the stage of intuitive assessment.
Intuition is somewhat manifested in the mentally ill
people: patients with schizophrenia extract only unlikely associations from
their memory, thereby lowering the efficiency of intuitive forecast. Neurotic
patients doubt over which of the many options to choose. Healthy people are
blessed with the gift of intuition with the endowment of intuitive abilities
more common for balanced and sociable individuals. But depressed and aggressive
people lack social as well as other kinds of sensitivity.
There is also a difference in the
propensity to intuitive knowledge between men and women: an American
psychologist Judith Hallanalyzed 125 studies and concluded that
women are superior to men in decoding nonverbal emotional messages. When female
subjects were shown a two-minute silent movie with upset women, the women in
the study made more accurate guesses whether the woman in the movie was
criticizing someone or discussing her own divorce.
In other experiments, the sensitivity of women to
non-verbal signals has allowed them to lead in detecting lies.Women also
surpass men in recognizing whether a couple is actually loving and romantic, or
pretends to be, and also in telling which of the two people in a photographic
image is the boss, and who is a subordinate.
To understand someone in a second
The findings by American psychologists Nalini Ambadi and Robert
Rosenthal deal with the impact of first impressions and the rapid
spread of social intuition. “Thin slices” of someone’s behavior may become very
useful in these studies. Ambad and Rosenthal had recorded on tape 13 graduate
students at Harvard University giving lectures toundergraduates.
Then, the researchers looked at three “thin slices” of behavior
for each lecturer (ten-second clips from the beginning, middle and end of each
session), and evaluated their confidence, academic rigor, emotional warmth, and
other qualities. These ratings of behavior based on 30 seconds of lecturing
during the entire semester, were strikingly accurate in predicting what average
rating the lecturer would receive from students at the end of the semester.
In various experiments, “thin slices” have been studied with the
help of video clips (with or without sound recording) as well as
observations through a window with a one-way visibility. Just by listening to
the participants reciting the alphabet out loud, the observers were able to
make a fairly accurate intuitive guess about their social status and
personality.
After watching for 90 seconds the way people walk and talk,
observers could evaluate how others will be regarding these individuals. It was
also found that even just by looking at someone’s picture, we can make some
conclusions about the personal characteristics of this individual.
One of the most important benefits of social
intuition is the ability to subconsciously pick up insincerity and
dishonesty. Important observational data transform into intuitive
experience, which is then analyzed for each situation. If you lie, for example,
you become tense, and the facial expressions do not match the content of your
statements as well as the statements by other individuals participating in the
conversation. While our minds analyzes what is being said, the subconscious
mind absorbs what is being seen, indicating non-compliance, which can
even be dangerous (therefore people with well-developed intuition quickly
recognize scammers, individuals prone to sudden aggression in their
personality and the like).
Psychologist Paul Ekman, a professor at the
University of California in San Francisco and the author of the bestseller “Telling
Lies”, and the leading world specialist in identifying liars, has conducted
a series of tests about the extent ofability to recognize lies. He came
to the conclusion that in 86% of cases of telling lies, the tone or the voice
volume will change.
Ekman also found that among several groups of people who
frequently test a lot of people on the matter of lying (students, mental health
professionals, experts in lie detector, judges, police workers), only one
group, the U.S. intelligence agents, can really identify the lies (64%).
However, when trying to develop this skill, your ability to observe things and
to listen to emotions(both your own and the person you are
communicating with) before they are processed by intellect (to scan, as they
say), you can avoid the risk of being deceived.
We all have another interesting feature: when we hear
how one person tells bad or good things about another person, we attribute the
same qualities to the person who is talking. During several experiments,
psychologists Linda May, Donal Carlston and John Skowronski found
that if someone spreads rumors about someone, listeners unconsciously associate
the content of these rumors with the storyteller.
Call someone a fool or a jerk, and people may relate these
qualities with you later. Describe someone as fine and compassionate person,
and you will also acquire these qualities. Even those who “simply” bring bad
news will be instinctively disliked, as well as strangers who talk unfavorably
about someone they do not like.
0 comments:
Post a Comment